https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267424 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's claim for CENVAT credit for services availed by the head office, despite the absence of Input Service Distributor (ISD) registration. The Tribunal emphasized that denial of credit would be unjust as the services were genuine and relevant to the business. The appellant was deemed entitled to the credit for the period before 1.4.2008. The Tribunal directed verification of credit reversal from 1.4.2008 to 31.12.2008, with legal consequences to follow based on the findings, and partially allowed the appeal. en-us Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267424 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's claim for CENVAT credit for services availed by the head office, despite the absence of Input Service Distributor (ISD) registration. The Tribunal emphasized that denial of credit would be unjust as the services were genuine and relevant to the business. The appellant was deemed entitled to the credit for the period before 1.4.2008. The Tribunal directed verification of credit reversal from 1.4.2008 to 31.12.2008, with legal consequences to follow based on the findings, and partially allowed the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267424