<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 928 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175088</link>
    <description>Further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is a continuation of the earlier investigation and may proceed after filing of the police report; it is not a fresh investigation or reinvestigation. Prior permission of the Magistrate is not mandatory for such further investigation, and material collected at that stage cannot be ignored merely because it is produced during trial. Section 231 also supports the prosecution&#039;s right to produce witnesses necessary to unfold its case, even if they were not examined earlier. The order permitting summoning of witnesses named in the supplementary charge-sheet was upheld, and the revision was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 928 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175088</link>
      <description>Further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is a continuation of the earlier investigation and may proceed after filing of the police report; it is not a fresh investigation or reinvestigation. Prior permission of the Magistrate is not mandatory for such further investigation, and material collected at that stage cannot be ignored merely because it is produced during trial. Section 231 also supports the prosecution&#039;s right to produce witnesses necessary to unfold its case, even if they were not examined earlier. The order permitting summoning of witnesses named in the supplementary charge-sheet was upheld, and the revision was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>