https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175079 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment. It held that the respondent had a fair opportunity to defend himself, there was no violation of natural justice, and the Superintendent of Police was the competent authority to dismiss the respondent. The respondent was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal to the appellants. en-us Wed, 18 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Aug 2016 11:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175079 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment. It held that the respondent had a fair opportunity to defend himself, there was no violation of natural justice, and the Superintendent of Police was the competent authority to dismiss the respondent. The respondent was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal to the appellants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175079