<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 604 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175074</link>
    <description>Tax on the actual sale consideration, rather than the assessable value of goods, was upheld where the appellate authority found no material to show that the assessee had disclosed a wrong consideration in its returns. It held that the assessing authority had relied only on the price reflected in excise proceedings, without proving that the sale consideration shown by the assessee was incorrect. On that basis, the orders of the appellate authority and the Tax Board were found to suffer from no illegality, and the revision was liable to be dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 604 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175074</link>
      <description>Tax on the actual sale consideration, rather than the assessable value of goods, was upheld where the appellate authority found no material to show that the assessee had disclosed a wrong consideration in its returns. It held that the assessing authority had relied only on the price reflected in excise proceedings, without proving that the sale consideration shown by the assessee was incorrect. On that basis, the orders of the appellate authority and the Tax Board were found to suffer from no illegality, and the revision was liable to be dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>