https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175073 Review jurisdiction cannot be used to reopen and reverse a concluded second appeal judgment merely because another construction of the same document is possible. The document had already been interpreted in second appeal as a deed of settlement, and a later review order by another Judge, treating it as a will in the absence of the original Judge, amounted to substitution of one view for another on the merits. The proper remedy for the aggrieved party was an appeal, not review. The review order was therefore beyond jurisdiction and the second appeal judgment was restored. en-us Tue, 11 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Nov 2015 12:51:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175073 Review jurisdiction cannot be used to reopen and reverse a concluded second appeal judgment merely because another construction of the same document is possible. The document had already been interpreted in second appeal as a deed of settlement, and a later review order by another Judge, treating it as a will in the absence of the original Judge, amounted to substitution of one view for another on the merits. The proper remedy for the aggrieved party was an appeal, not review. The review order was therefore beyond jurisdiction and the second appeal judgment was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175073