<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (11) TMI 157 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175071</link>
    <description>A second revision is barred once the same party has chosen the revisional forum under the Criminal Procedure Code, so the High Court could not entertain a further revision by recharacterising it or by resort to supervisory jurisdiction to bypass the statutory prohibition. An old maintenance order made under Section 488 of the 1898 Code was treated as an order under the corresponding provision of the 1973 Code by virtue of the saving clause, and it remained subject to cancellation on changed circumstances. The son&#039;s attainment of majority, together with the changed legal position, justified cancellation of maintenance and restored the Magistrate&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (11) TMI 157 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175071</link>
      <description>A second revision is barred once the same party has chosen the revisional forum under the Criminal Procedure Code, so the High Court could not entertain a further revision by recharacterising it or by resort to supervisory jurisdiction to bypass the statutory prohibition. An old maintenance order made under Section 488 of the 1898 Code was treated as an order under the corresponding provision of the 1973 Code by virtue of the saving clause, and it remained subject to cancellation on changed circumstances. The son&#039;s attainment of majority, together with the changed legal position, justified cancellation of maintenance and restored the Magistrate&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>