https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175070 An order passed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is judicial in nature and therefore amenable to review under Article 137 of the Constitution; the finality clause in Section 11(7) does not exclude that constitutional power. However, review cannot function as an appeal or rehearing, and a prayer already considered and rejected in the original proceedings cannot be revived indirectly through review. The erroneous recital in the order was corrected, but the attempt to reopen the refusal to appoint three arbitrators and secure the same substantive relief failed. en-us Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175070 An order passed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is judicial in nature and therefore amenable to review under Article 137 of the Constitution; the finality clause in Section 11(7) does not exclude that constitutional power. However, review cannot function as an appeal or rehearing, and a prayer already considered and rejected in the original proceedings cannot be revived indirectly through review. The erroneous recital in the order was corrected, but the attempt to reopen the refusal to appoint three arbitrators and secure the same substantive relief failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175070