https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175069 A review application is not maintainable merely because a later-engaged counsel wishes to raise new grounds that were not argued in the writ petition. Where the writ petition has already been fully heard and decided on the merits of the points raised, review cannot be used to secure a fresh opportunity to re-argue the matter or to cure an earlier counsel's omission. In the absence of any allegation of oversight, mistake, or error in the judgment itself, the court declined review and dismissed the application. en-us Thu, 12 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Nov 2015 12:35:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175069 A review application is not maintainable merely because a later-engaged counsel wishes to raise new grounds that were not argued in the writ petition. Where the writ petition has already been fully heard and decided on the merits of the points raised, review cannot be used to secure a fresh opportunity to re-argue the matter or to cure an earlier counsel's omission. In the absence of any allegation of oversight, mistake, or error in the judgment itself, the court declined review and dismissed the application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175069