<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 574 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175066</link>
    <description>The court condoned a 17-day delay in the Revenue&#039;s appeal filing due to explanations and mutual consent. The appeal contested dropped penalties and interest on service tax, focusing on non-payment for goods transport services, penalties adjudication, and Rule 7A analysis. The judgment referenced the Laghu Udyog Bharati case to assess demand notice validity, highlighting limitations on demands raised beyond specified periods. Following precedent, the court rejected the appeal against dropped penalties and interest on tax, emphasizing the unsustainability of demands for service tax for a specific period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 11:36:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 574 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175066</link>
      <description>The court condoned a 17-day delay in the Revenue&#039;s appeal filing due to explanations and mutual consent. The appeal contested dropped penalties and interest on service tax, focusing on non-payment for goods transport services, penalties adjudication, and Rule 7A analysis. The judgment referenced the Laghu Udyog Bharati case to assess demand notice validity, highlighting limitations on demands raised beyond specified periods. Following precedent, the court rejected the appeal against dropped penalties and interest on tax, emphasizing the unsustainability of demands for service tax for a specific period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>