<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 225 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267416</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a service provider, allowing them to avail CENVAT credit on service tax liability and discharge service tax under Notification No.1/2006-ST. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s actions legitimate, citing precedents and legal provisions. Penalties under different sections of the Finance Act, 1994 were not imposed on the appellant, with the Tribunal setting aside the penalties initially imposed by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 225 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267416</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a service provider, allowing them to avail CENVAT credit on service tax liability and discharge service tax under Notification No.1/2006-ST. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s actions legitimate, citing precedents and legal provisions. Penalties under different sections of the Finance Act, 1994 were not imposed on the appellant, with the Tribunal setting aside the penalties initially imposed by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>