<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 213 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267404</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of the assessees and reduced the penalty on the director. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the demand of Cenvat credit for non-receipt of inputs and maintained penalties for fraudulent availing of Cenvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 23:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 213 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267404</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of the assessees and reduced the penalty on the director. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the demand of Cenvat credit for non-receipt of inputs and maintained penalties for fraudulent availing of Cenvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>