https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1008 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that their activity of technology transfer does not constitute 'Consulting Engineer' services for Service Tax liability. Citing various judgments, the Tribunal emphasized the distinction between technology transfer and consulting services, stating that transferring technology without providing engineering consulting does not fall under the 'Consulting Engineer' category. The impugned order was deemed incorrect, and the appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellants. en-us Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1008 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that their activity of technology transfer does not constitute 'Consulting Engineer' services for Service Tax liability. Citing various judgments, the Tribunal emphasized the distinction between technology transfer and consulting services, stating that transferring technology without providing engineering consulting does not fall under the 'Consulting Engineer' category. The impugned order was deemed incorrect, and the appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1008