https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267398 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the presence of the appellant's name on the invoices as indicative of a connection to the services received. Despite the absence of the appellant's address on the invoices, the Tribunal highlighted the consistent accounting of transactions and clarified that the job worker acted on behalf of the appellant, justifying the receipt of services. The case was remanded for verification of payment details and accounting, with instructions to grant Cenvat Credit if found in order, stressing adherence to principles of natural justice. en-us Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:45:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267398 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the presence of the appellant's name on the invoices as indicative of a connection to the services received. Despite the absence of the appellant's address on the invoices, the Tribunal highlighted the consistent accounting of transactions and clarified that the job worker acted on behalf of the appellant, justifying the receipt of services. The case was remanded for verification of payment details and accounting, with instructions to grant Cenvat Credit if found in order, stressing adherence to principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267398