<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 204 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267395</link>
    <description>Refund of the stated foreign currency amount was to be made in Indian rupees at the buying rate of the US dollar on the date of transfer by RTGS mode, rather than at a later prevailing rate. The direction tied conversion to the transfer date and the remittance method, making the date of transfer determinative for the rupee equivalent. The Customs Department was permitted to make the refund accordingly by the specified deadline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 09:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 204 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267395</link>
      <description>Refund of the stated foreign currency amount was to be made in Indian rupees at the buying rate of the US dollar on the date of transfer by RTGS mode, rather than at a later prevailing rate. The direction tied conversion to the transfer date and the remittance method, making the date of transfer determinative for the rupee equivalent. The Customs Department was permitted to make the refund accordingly by the specified deadline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>