<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 203 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267394</link>
    <description>An importer who consented in writing to an enhanced assessable value and paid duty without protest was treated as having accepted the revision, making a later challenge to that valuation untenable. The commentary states that, where a show cause notice was waived at the importer&#039;s request, the Revenue was not required to further prove the valuation, and natural justice could not be used to reopen the accepted assessment. It also notes that a re-determination supported by NIDB data was not shown to be arbitrary or unreasonable, and prior precedent was said to favour estoppel against a party that voluntarily accepts the revised value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 203 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267394</link>
      <description>An importer who consented in writing to an enhanced assessable value and paid duty without protest was treated as having accepted the revision, making a later challenge to that valuation untenable. The commentary states that, where a show cause notice was waived at the importer&#039;s request, the Revenue was not required to further prove the valuation, and natural justice could not be used to reopen the accepted assessment. It also notes that a re-determination supported by NIDB data was not shown to be arbitrary or unreasonable, and prior precedent was said to favour estoppel against a party that voluntarily accepts the revised value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>