<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 198 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267389</link>
    <description>Declared value for imported speakers was rejected on the basis that Customs authorities found it unacceptable, and valuation under Rule 10A of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 was therefore justified. The valuation findings were concurrent findings of fact, so no interference was warranted. The rejection of the declared value and the Rule 10A valuation were upheld, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:45:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 198 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267389</link>
      <description>Declared value for imported speakers was rejected on the basis that Customs authorities found it unacceptable, and valuation under Rule 10A of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 was therefore justified. The valuation findings were concurrent findings of fact, so no interference was warranted. The rejection of the declared value and the Rule 10A valuation were upheld, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>