<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1007</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the imposition of service tax on tour operators by the Union Government, dismissing the appeal challenging the order. The Court found no grounds for interference, emphasizing the proper interpretation of the law and the validity of the service tax collection from tourists. The judgment affirmed the distinction between tax and service charge, concluding that the service tax imposition was legally valid and aligned with precedents. The appeal was dismissed for lacking merit, upholding the order of the learned single Judge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1007</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the imposition of service tax on tour operators by the Union Government, dismissing the appeal challenging the order. The Court found no grounds for interference, emphasizing the proper interpretation of the law and the validity of the service tax collection from tourists. The judgment affirmed the distinction between tax and service charge, concluding that the service tax imposition was legally valid and aligned with precedents. The appeal was dismissed for lacking merit, upholding the order of the learned single Judge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>