https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267383 An ECIR and connected provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 were not quashed because the charge-sheet disclosed scheduled offences under the IPC, giving a prima facie basis to proceed under the Act. The Court rejected the contention that action under PMLA could arise only after the predicate offences were finally established. It also held that the availability of the statutory remedy under Section 8 and the appeal mechanism under Section 26 made interference under Section 482 CrPC unwarranted at that stage, so no interference was called for. en-us Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Nov 2016 15:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267383 An ECIR and connected provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 were not quashed because the charge-sheet disclosed scheduled offences under the IPC, giving a prima facie basis to proceed under the Act. The Court rejected the contention that action under PMLA could arise only after the predicate offences were finally established. It also held that the availability of the statutory remedy under Section 8 and the appeal mechanism under Section 26 made interference under Section 482 CrPC unwarranted at that stage, so no interference was called for. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267383