<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 186 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267377</link>
    <description>The tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to use the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) of international transactions, setting aside the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) previously used. The TPO was instructed to consider comparables based on an independent study, allow multiple-year data, and use weighted average data for determining the ALP. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:43:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 186 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267377</link>
      <description>The tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to use the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) of international transactions, setting aside the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) previously used. The TPO was instructed to consider comparables based on an independent study, allow multiple-year data, and use weighted average data for determining the ALP. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>