https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175056 Freight charged separately for moving cement from the depot to the buyer's destination was treated as part of turnover only if the controlling price order showed that reimbursable freight extended beyond the factory-to-depot leg; because the Tribunal had not examined the first appellate findings on that factual basis, the turnover issue was remitted for fresh decision. Interest under section 8(1) could not be levied on tax attributable to freight that was genuinely disputed and never admitted by the dealer; such liability, if ultimately found payable, would fall under the provision governing unpaid assessed tax, so the deletion of that interest was sustained. en-us Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Nov 2015 16:55:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175056 Freight charged separately for moving cement from the depot to the buyer's destination was treated as part of turnover only if the controlling price order showed that reimbursable freight extended beyond the factory-to-depot leg; because the Tribunal had not examined the first appellate findings on that factual basis, the turnover issue was remitted for fresh decision. Interest under section 8(1) could not be levied on tax attributable to freight that was genuinely disputed and never admitted by the dealer; such liability, if ultimately found payable, would fall under the provision governing unpaid assessed tax, so the deletion of that interest was sustained. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175056