https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=993 Service tax demand was remanded because the Commissioner failed to consider material evidence showing the appellant serviced cable operators, not ultimate subscribers, and ignored the Board circular on liability. The order was found to be non-speaking and unsupported by effective discussion of the defence, amounting to a breach of natural justice. Fresh adjudication was directed after proper hearing and consideration of the record. en-us Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=993 Service tax demand was remanded because the Commissioner failed to consider material evidence showing the appellant serviced cable operators, not ultimate subscribers, and ignored the Board circular on liability. The order was found to be non-speaking and unsupported by effective discussion of the defence, amounting to a breach of natural justice. Fresh adjudication was directed after proper hearing and consideration of the record. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=993