<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 695 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175038</link>
    <description>Credible eyewitness testimony can sustain a murder conviction even when minor discrepancies appear between ocular and medical evidence, because medical opinion is not conclusive if the eyewitness account is otherwise trustworthy. A plea of alibi fails where the supporting documents are general and do not exclude the accused&#039;s presence at the scene at the relevant time. Common intention under Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code can be inferred from concerted conduct and surrounding circumstances; prior concert or identical acts are not required. On the accepted evidence, joint liability for murder was upheld and the convictions and sentences were maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 695 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175038</link>
      <description>Credible eyewitness testimony can sustain a murder conviction even when minor discrepancies appear between ocular and medical evidence, because medical opinion is not conclusive if the eyewitness account is otherwise trustworthy. A plea of alibi fails where the supporting documents are general and do not exclude the accused&#039;s presence at the scene at the relevant time. Common intention under Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code can be inferred from concerted conduct and surrounding circumstances; prior concert or identical acts are not required. On the accepted evidence, joint liability for murder was upheld and the convictions and sentences were maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>