<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s Works Contract Service Under Scrutiny; Appeal Raises New Issue, Leads to Remand and Rs. 5 Lakh Penalty.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25714</link>
    <description>Whether the appellant had in fact provided the works contract service is of course a question of fact. It is so asserted in the appeal for the first time - matter remanded back - Since the appellant wholly obstructedhas failed to cooperate in the adjudication proceeding, cost of &amp;#8377; 5 lakh imposed - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 10:04:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 10:04:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s Works Contract Service Under Scrutiny; Appeal Raises New Issue, Leads to Remand and Rs. 5 Lakh Penalty.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25714</link>
      <description>Whether the appellant had in fact provided the works contract service is of course a question of fact. It is so asserted in the appeal for the first time - matter remanded back - Since the appellant wholly obstructedhas failed to cooperate in the adjudication proceeding, cost of &amp;#8377; 5 lakh imposed - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 10:04:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>