<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 165 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267356</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties on the appellant for amounts collected for aerobics and yoga classes, ruling that these services are taxable under Health and Fitness services. The extended period for tax demand was deemed valid due to the appellant&#039;s lack of cooperation and failure to provide necessary documents. The tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s arguments, affirming the legality and correctness of the order without any flaws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 165 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267356</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties on the appellant for amounts collected for aerobics and yoga classes, ruling that these services are taxable under Health and Fitness services. The extended period for tax demand was deemed valid due to the appellant&#039;s lack of cooperation and failure to provide necessary documents. The tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s arguments, affirming the legality and correctness of the order without any flaws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>