<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 17 - CESTAT,BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=989</link>
    <description>Service tax liability was held to be computable only on amounts actually received, not on sums merely shown as due in income tax returns, so the demand was remanded for fresh quantification after excluding outstanding dues. On limitation, the Tribunal rejected the plea that the demand was time-barred, holding that the extended period could apply where statutory grounds such as non-disclosure or failure to file returns were established. The appeals were therefore disposed of by remand on quantification, while the limitation challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 17 - CESTAT,BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=989</link>
      <description>Service tax liability was held to be computable only on amounts actually received, not on sums merely shown as due in income tax returns, so the demand was remanded for fresh quantification after excluding outstanding dues. On limitation, the Tribunal rejected the plea that the demand was time-barred, holding that the extended period could apply where statutory grounds such as non-disclosure or failure to file returns were established. The appeals were therefore disposed of by remand on quantification, while the limitation challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>