<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 161 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267352</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court applied the de minimis principle in a tax appeal and dismissed the matter solely because the tax effect was insubstantial. The Court treated the negligible fiscal impact as sufficient ground to decline further examination and did not decide any other legal or factual issue. The operative effect is that the appeal stands dismissed on the basis of meagre tax effect alone, with no merits determination recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 09:48:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 161 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267352</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court applied the de minimis principle in a tax appeal and dismissed the matter solely because the tax effect was insubstantial. The Court treated the negligible fiscal impact as sufficient ground to decline further examination and did not decide any other legal or factual issue. The operative effect is that the appeal stands dismissed on the basis of meagre tax effect alone, with no merits determination recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>