<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 158 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267349</link>
    <description>Amounts deposited during pending tax appeals pursuant to interim orders were required to be adjusted first towards accrued interest under section 55C of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, and only thereafter towards principal. The later amnesty scheme under section 23B did not alter the character of those pre-existing litigation deposits or convert them into refundable amounts for amnesty computation. The Court further held that the mere filing of a special leave petition did not continue the earlier revision proceedings so as to displace the statutory mode of appropriation. Accordingly, the deposits were liable to appropriation under section 55C and could not be claimed as refundable for amnesty purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 09:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 158 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267349</link>
      <description>Amounts deposited during pending tax appeals pursuant to interim orders were required to be adjusted first towards accrued interest under section 55C of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, and only thereafter towards principal. The later amnesty scheme under section 23B did not alter the character of those pre-existing litigation deposits or convert them into refundable amounts for amnesty computation. The Court further held that the mere filing of a special leave petition did not continue the earlier revision proceedings so as to displace the statutory mode of appropriation. Accordingly, the deposits were liable to appropriation under section 55C and could not be claimed as refundable for amnesty purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>