https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267343 The appeal concerned whether any substantial question of law arose from findings that the parties were not related persons and that the additional trade discount was justified by expenses on seminars, publicity and marketing. The Supreme Court treated both matters as factual determinations based on the evidence and the Tribunal's appreciation of that evidence. As no legal error was shown and no substantial question of law arose, the appeal was not interfered with and was rejected. en-us Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267343 The appeal concerned whether any substantial question of law arose from findings that the parties were not related persons and that the additional trade discount was justified by expenses on seminars, publicity and marketing. The Supreme Court treated both matters as factual determinations based on the evidence and the Tribunal's appreciation of that evidence. As no legal error was shown and no substantial question of law arose, the appeal was not interfered with and was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267343