<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 146 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267337</link>
    <description>Liability for outstanding central excise dues cannot be fastened on an auction purchaser where only secured assets are sold and the business is not transferred as a going concern. The proviso to section 11 applies only when the defaulter transfers the business or trade, or changes ownership, and the transferee succeeds to that business; a mere sale of land, plant, machinery and other assets does not create successor liability. The existence of a statutory charge under section 11E does not alter that result. A show cause notice for suspension or revocation of excise registration was also unsustainable where it rested on alleged breach of sale-certificate conditions and on the earlier registration of the same premises in the defaulting company&#039;s name, since registration is person-specific and contractual sale conditions do not bind the excise authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 146 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267337</link>
      <description>Liability for outstanding central excise dues cannot be fastened on an auction purchaser where only secured assets are sold and the business is not transferred as a going concern. The proviso to section 11 applies only when the defaulter transfers the business or trade, or changes ownership, and the transferee succeeds to that business; a mere sale of land, plant, machinery and other assets does not create successor liability. The existence of a statutory charge under section 11E does not alter that result. A show cause notice for suspension or revocation of excise registration was also unsustainable where it rested on alleged breach of sale-certificate conditions and on the earlier registration of the same premises in the defaulting company&#039;s name, since registration is person-specific and contractual sale conditions do not bind the excise authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>