<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 143 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267334</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the applications for condonation of delay and the appeals due to the appellants&#039; failure to satisfactorily explain the delays in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to time limits for filing appeals and providing cogent evidence to support any delays adequately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 09:47:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 143 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267334</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the applications for condonation of delay and the appeals due to the appellants&#039; failure to satisfactorily explain the delays in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to time limits for filing appeals and providing cogent evidence to support any delays adequately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>