https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267330 The Court set aside the final orders of the Settlement Commission and remanded the Settlement Applications for reconsideration. It found that the rejection based on non-payment of interest under Section 28AB was erroneous as the provision had been replaced by Section 28AA. Additionally, the Court clarified that the pending appeal before the CESTAT was unrelated to the subject matter of the Settlement Applications. The Settlement Commission was directed to provide a fair hearing and could impose conditions for interest payment under Section 28AA. en-us Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267330 The Court set aside the final orders of the Settlement Commission and remanded the Settlement Applications for reconsideration. It found that the rejection based on non-payment of interest under Section 28AB was erroneous as the provision had been replaced by Section 28AA. Additionally, the Court clarified that the pending appeal before the CESTAT was unrelated to the subject matter of the Settlement Applications. The Settlement Commission was directed to provide a fair hearing and could impose conditions for interest payment under Section 28AA. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267330