<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 110 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267301</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal by deleting the disallowance under section 14A, remitting the issue of Securities Transaction Tax (STT) allocation to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, and directing a reconsideration of the allocation of common expenses between speculation and non-speculation business based on previous decisions. The tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s grievance in principle, sending the matter back to the AO for further review. The judgment was delivered on 29th September 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 09:43:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 110 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267301</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal by deleting the disallowance under section 14A, remitting the issue of Securities Transaction Tax (STT) allocation to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, and directing a reconsideration of the allocation of common expenses between speculation and non-speculation business based on previous decisions. The tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s grievance in principle, sending the matter back to the AO for further review. The judgment was delivered on 29th September 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>