<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1144 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175029</link>
    <description>Special Leave Petition in a central excise matter was dismissed, while the time permitted for making the pre-deposit was extended by five weeks from the date of the order. The operative effect is that the challenge did not succeed at the SLP stage, but the assessee received additional time to comply with the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1144 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175029</link>
      <description>Special Leave Petition in a central excise matter was dismissed, while the time permitted for making the pre-deposit was extended by five weeks from the date of the order. The operative effect is that the challenge did not succeed at the SLP stage, but the assessee received additional time to comply with the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>