<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 922 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175026</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to pursue an appeal to the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) for adjudication, instructing a decision on the release of goods within two weeks. The judgment clarified the challenge to conditions for provisional release of imported goods, emphasized the applicability of Customs Act provisions, and highlighted the need for the petitioner to seek an alternative remedy under section 128 of the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 922 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175026</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to pursue an appeal to the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) for adjudication, instructing a decision on the release of goods within two weeks. The judgment clarified the challenge to conditions for provisional release of imported goods, emphasized the applicability of Customs Act provisions, and highlighted the need for the petitioner to seek an alternative remedy under section 128 of the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>