<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 300 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175027</link>
    <description>Advertisement charges were in dispute for inclusion in the assessable value under Central Excise, along with the penalty imposed by the Tribunal. The Supreme Court found no ground to entertain the appeal on either point and dismissed it accordingly. The order leaves undisturbed the Tribunal&#039;s decision against the assessee on both the valuation issue and the penalty issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 17:23:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 300 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175027</link>
      <description>Advertisement charges were in dispute for inclusion in the assessable value under Central Excise, along with the penalty imposed by the Tribunal. The Supreme Court found no ground to entertain the appeal on either point and dismissed it accordingly. The order leaves undisturbed the Tribunal&#039;s decision against the assessee on both the valuation issue and the penalty issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>