https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175024 The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of apparent mistakes in the order, related to the addition of Rs. 1.55 lakh based on two Fixed Deposit Receipts. Despite discrepancies, the Tribunal found the issues raised did not qualify as apparent mistakes under section 254(2) of the Act. The application was deemed as a request for a review of the order, which is not permissible, leading to the dismissal of the Miscellaneous Application on 21st April, 2011. en-us Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:03:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175024 The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of apparent mistakes in the order, related to the addition of Rs. 1.55 lakh based on two Fixed Deposit Receipts. Despite discrepancies, the Tribunal found the issues raised did not qualify as apparent mistakes under section 254(2) of the Act. The application was deemed as a request for a review of the order, which is not permissible, leading to the dismissal of the Miscellaneous Application on 21st April, 2011. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175024