https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=981 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, BANGALORE ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that their activity of procuring orders for specific companies did not classify them as a 'Clearing and Forwarding Agent'. The Tribunal referenced a previous case and emphasized that solely procuring orders and receiving commission does not constitute 'Clearing and Forwarding Agent' services. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any necessary relief. The Tribunal found that the Revenue did not dispute the appellant's role of procuring orders for their principal, leading to the conclusion that the appellant's activities did not fall under the disputed classification. en-us Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=981 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, BANGALORE ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that their activity of procuring orders for specific companies did not classify them as a 'Clearing and Forwarding Agent'. The Tribunal referenced a previous case and emphasized that solely procuring orders and receiving commission does not constitute 'Clearing and Forwarding Agent' services. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any necessary relief. The Tribunal found that the Revenue did not dispute the appellant's role of procuring orders for their principal, leading to the conclusion that the appellant's activities did not fall under the disputed classification. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=981