<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue&#039;s Demand Overturned: Cenvat Credit Investigation Wasn&#039;t Extended Within One-Year Limit; Demand Beyond Period Invalid.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25699</link>
    <description>The informations provided by the appellant are more than sufficient for the Revenue, that if at all they are of the view that the Cenvat credit is not admissible they could have extended their investigation and could have issued show cause notice well within the normal period of one year - Demand beyond normal period of limitation set aside - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:17:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:17:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue&#039;s Demand Overturned: Cenvat Credit Investigation Wasn&#039;t Extended Within One-Year Limit; Demand Beyond Period Invalid.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25699</link>
      <description>The informations provided by the appellant are more than sufficient for the Revenue, that if at all they are of the view that the Cenvat credit is not admissible they could have extended their investigation and could have issued show cause notice well within the normal period of one year - Demand beyond normal period of limitation set aside - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:17:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>