<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (5) TMI 233 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175018</link>
    <description>Under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, confiscation under Section 6A and prosecution under Section 7 operate as separate consequences of breach of a control order. Section 6E ousts the jurisdiction of other courts and authorities and vests exclusive interim authority in the Collector or State Government over possession, delivery, disposal, release or distribution pending confiscation. The term &quot;release&quot; does not permit restoration of seized essential commodities to the owner or possessor, because that would undermine confiscation and the Act&#039;s object of preventing hoarding, scarcity and disruption of public distribution. The Collector may order only limited interim disposal consistent with the statutory scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 10:57:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (5) TMI 233 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175018</link>
      <description>Under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, confiscation under Section 6A and prosecution under Section 7 operate as separate consequences of breach of a control order. Section 6E ousts the jurisdiction of other courts and authorities and vests exclusive interim authority in the Collector or State Government over possession, delivery, disposal, release or distribution pending confiscation. The term &quot;release&quot; does not permit restoration of seized essential commodities to the owner or possessor, because that would undermine confiscation and the Act&#039;s object of preventing hoarding, scarcity and disruption of public distribution. The Collector may order only limited interim disposal consistent with the statutory scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>