<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 103 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267294</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant&#039;s adjustment of the excess service tax payment is permissible under Rule 6(1A) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. This decision set aside the demand of Rs. 1,57,205/- and allowed the full adjustment of the advance payment against the subsequent service tax liability, emphasizing that denying the adjustment would lead to unjust enrichment of the government.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 103 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267294</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant&#039;s adjustment of the excess service tax payment is permissible under Rule 6(1A) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. This decision set aside the demand of Rs. 1,57,205/- and allowed the full adjustment of the advance payment against the subsequent service tax liability, emphasizing that denying the adjustment would lead to unjust enrichment of the government.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>