<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 95 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267286</link>
    <description>SSI exemption remains available for a unit&#039;s own clearances even where it avails CENVAT or MODVAT credit on inputs used for branded goods manufactured on job work for third parties, provided duty has been paid on those branded goods. The relevant exemption notifications treated clearances under another person&#039;s brand name as excluded from both the aggregate-clearance computation and the exemption itself, thereby separating such duty-paid branded goods from the assessee&#039;s exempt own products. The earlier ruling on Notification No. 175/86-CE was limited to simultaneous exemption and Modvat under a different scheme and did not control later notifications containing express exclusion clauses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 95 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267286</link>
      <description>SSI exemption remains available for a unit&#039;s own clearances even where it avails CENVAT or MODVAT credit on inputs used for branded goods manufactured on job work for third parties, provided duty has been paid on those branded goods. The relevant exemption notifications treated clearances under another person&#039;s brand name as excluded from both the aggregate-clearance computation and the exemption itself, thereby separating such duty-paid branded goods from the assessee&#039;s exempt own products. The earlier ruling on Notification No. 175/86-CE was limited to simultaneous exemption and Modvat under a different scheme and did not control later notifications containing express exclusion clauses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>