<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 92 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267283</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit is unavailable on duty-paid invoices alone when the corresponding inputs are not actually received or used in manufacture. On the facts, manipulated transport and dealership records, diversion of goods, and failure to produce independent proof of receipt or consumption supported denial of credit and invocation of the extended period. The challenge based on natural justice failed because inspection and copies were offered, the key statement was not retracted, and the existing material was otherwise sufficient. Penalties for confiscation-related conduct were sustained, though reduced for some parties, and interest followed as a statutory consequence of the confirmed duty demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 92 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267283</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit is unavailable on duty-paid invoices alone when the corresponding inputs are not actually received or used in manufacture. On the facts, manipulated transport and dealership records, diversion of goods, and failure to produce independent proof of receipt or consumption supported denial of credit and invocation of the extended period. The challenge based on natural justice failed because inspection and copies were offered, the key statement was not retracted, and the existing material was otherwise sufficient. Penalties for confiscation-related conduct were sustained, though reduced for some parties, and interest followed as a statutory consequence of the confirmed duty demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>