<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 85 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267276</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the activity of assembling, installing, and commissioning switching equipment for telephone exchanges did not constitute manufacture. The decision was based on the precedent set in a previous case where it was observed that no new goods emerged post-installation, maintaining that the switching systems retained their original form and characteristics. As a result, the impugned order demanding duty, interest, and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 06:19:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 85 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267276</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the activity of assembling, installing, and commissioning switching equipment for telephone exchanges did not constitute manufacture. The decision was based on the precedent set in a previous case where it was observed that no new goods emerged post-installation, maintaining that the switching systems retained their original form and characteristics. As a result, the impugned order demanding duty, interest, and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>