https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267274 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the rejection of their refund claim for CVD on imported rubber, citing finality of assessment, time bar, and unjust enrichment. Despite appellant's arguments referencing legal judgments and provisions, the Tribunal upheld the rejection, emphasizing the significance of the assessment order and time limitations. The issue of unjust enrichment was not separately addressed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal based on the initial grounds. en-us Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267274 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the rejection of their refund claim for CVD on imported rubber, citing finality of assessment, time bar, and unjust enrichment. Despite appellant's arguments referencing legal judgments and provisions, the Tribunal upheld the rejection, emphasizing the significance of the assessment order and time limitations. The issue of unjust enrichment was not separately addressed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal based on the initial grounds. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267274