<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 77 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267268</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of adjudication and the final order of the Appellate Tribunal. The appellant was discharged from the charges under Section 9(1)(b) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1999. The court directed the refund of the penalty and the confiscated amount to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 06:17:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 77 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267268</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of adjudication and the final order of the Appellate Tribunal. The appellant was discharged from the charges under Section 9(1)(b) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1999. The court directed the refund of the penalty and the confiscated amount to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>