<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 64 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267255</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to recalculate the arithmetic mean of the remaining comparable companies and apply the required adjustment under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act. The appeal by the assessee was partially allowed, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected. The decision highlighted the significance of functional comparability and the proper application of filters in transfer pricing assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 06:16:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 64 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267255</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to recalculate the arithmetic mean of the remaining comparable companies and apply the required adjustment under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act. The appeal by the assessee was partially allowed, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected. The decision highlighted the significance of functional comparability and the proper application of filters in transfer pricing assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>