<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 63 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267254</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) for packing material expenses and sales promotion/selling expenses. It determined that the transactions were genuine sales contracts, not subject to Sections 194C and 194H, thus no TDS deductions were required. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed on 28/09/2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 63 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267254</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) for packing material expenses and sales promotion/selling expenses. It determined that the transactions were genuine sales contracts, not subject to Sections 194C and 194H, thus no TDS deductions were required. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed on 28/09/2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>