<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 58 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267249</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with modifications to the disallowances under Section 14A and the dentistry expenses, while fully allowing the foreign exchange fluctuation loss. The Tribunal found that expenses were incurred for maintaining investments and recognized the consistency in the accounting method regarding foreign exchange fluctuations. The disallowance under Section 40A(ia) was adjusted based on the nature of expenses and TDS requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 06:16:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 58 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267249</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with modifications to the disallowances under Section 14A and the dentistry expenses, while fully allowing the foreign exchange fluctuation loss. The Tribunal found that expenses were incurred for maintaining investments and recognized the consistency in the accounting method regarding foreign exchange fluctuations. The disallowance under Section 40A(ia) was adjusted based on the nature of expenses and TDS requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>