<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Denies Refund Claim for Unjust Enrichment; Appellant&#039;s Failure to Comply with Stay Order Conditions Cited.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25680</link>
    <description>Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - recovery of duty by encashment of the Bank Guarantee - earlier stay order was vacated due to failure comply with stay order - Held that:- It is only &amp;#8377; 17.50 lakhs which was deposited by the appellant pursuant to the interim orders of the Court. The Court had directed the appellant to deposit - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 22:48:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 22:48:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Denies Refund Claim for Unjust Enrichment; Appellant&#039;s Failure to Comply with Stay Order Conditions Cited.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25680</link>
      <description>Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - recovery of duty by encashment of the Bank Guarantee - earlier stay order was vacated due to failure comply with stay order - Held that:- It is only &amp;#8377; 17.50 lakhs which was deposited by the appellant pursuant to the interim orders of the Court. The Court had directed the appellant to deposit - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 22:48:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>