https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175009 The court clarified that while Supreme Court judgments are binding on all courts under Article 141, the specific relief granted under extraordinary jurisdiction is not binding. In a case involving a husband acquitted of bigamy charges, the court held that the Supreme Court's decision to award compensation in a similar case does not create a binding precedent for High Courts or Subordinate Courts to follow. The court set aside the compensation awarded by the Magistrate, emphasizing that courts must consider the unique facts of each case before awarding compensation in criminal matters. en-us Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:26:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175009 The court clarified that while Supreme Court judgments are binding on all courts under Article 141, the specific relief granted under extraordinary jurisdiction is not binding. In a case involving a husband acquitted of bigamy charges, the court held that the Supreme Court's decision to award compensation in a similar case does not create a binding precedent for High Courts or Subordinate Courts to follow. The court set aside the compensation awarded by the Magistrate, emphasizing that courts must consider the unique facts of each case before awarding compensation in criminal matters. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175009